Grab my RSS feed | (What's this?)

About this Blog

Luke Edwards is Chief Sports Writer of The Journal and uses his blog to give a unique and entertaining insight into events at Newcastle United and Sunderland.

As well as football, Luke also regularly takes a wry look at the biggest sports stories from across the North-East and beyond. From cricket to rugby and basketball to boxing, some are criticised and some are praised.

Sometimes provocative, sometimes laugh-aloud funny, but always interesting Luke Who's Talking also gives you the chance to interact with Luke and have your say on all the major sporting issues.

Recent comments

Recent Posts

Sponsored links

Archives

Links

Sponsored links


Ring The Alarm

Posted by Luke on October 16, 2006 5:15 PM | 

Sound the alarm, push the panic button, prepare for attack, man overboard, sinking ship, put on your life jacket, every man for himself. Yep, that's right, Newcastle United have hurtled straight into an early-season crisis following the 2-1 defeat to Bolton Wanderers on Sunday.

Since the Magpies beat struggling West Ham United at Upton Park in mid-September they have won one game - against Estonia's finest Levadia Tallinn - lost three and drawn one. They have won once at home in the Premiership all season, against another struggling side, Wigan Athletic, back on August 18.

Only bottom club Charlton Athletic have a goal difference worse than a United team which has taken the lead in three successive league games at home and failed to take all three points.

While they may have successfully qualified for the Uefa Cup through the Intertoto Cup, the brutal and harsh reality is that they are going to be competing in European competition with a small squad which finds itself just two points off the relegation zone with seven points from eight games.

According to Graeme Souness you are only ever two defeats away from a crisis as manager at Newcastle United. Roeder will know exactly what his predecessor means at the moment.

There are, to his credit, no Souness-type excuses from Roeder, although the injuries to Michael Owen and Kieron Dyer apart, he does not have a crippling injury list.

What he does have is a weak defence in which every single member has made costly individual errors at some point this season and a threadbare squad because, between chairman Freddie Shepherd and himself, the club did not bring in the number or quality of players they needed to build on the momentum they gained under Roeder last season.

Anybody with only a passing interest in black and white affairs knew the club needed to buy at least two new strikers this summer, preferably with experience of English football, a top-class centre back and a left back. So why did this not happen?

Roeder can only work with what he has got and he is struggling; struggling to get the defence to stop making blunders, struggling to score enough goals and struggling to win enough games. He is struggling because his squad is short on quality and short on confidence in crucial areas.

As things stand, only the midfield can be considered strong enough and versatile enough to belong to a supposed top six club, but there is no point blaming Roeder at a time when he needs everyone to pull together if he is going to have any chance of turning things around.

For everyone who knows what Newcastle United is really about - it's supporters - the defeat at home to a side like Bolton was worrying enough, but you really know you are in danger of a crisis when the attendance at St James's Park is 4,000 below capacity for the first time in more than five years in the Premiership.

Newcastle supporters are the lifeblood of the club, they are the reason the Magpies can compete financially with the other powerhouses in the Premiership and it is their passion, rather than Newcastle's on-the-pitch success, which makes the club famous well beyond these shores.

United fans have a tendency to push the panic button too early and, to be fair, it is stll far too early in the season to write it off. But a home defeat to Fenerbahce in the Uefa Cup on Thursday night and the alarm bells really will be ringing. Lose at Middlesbrough on Sunday and their sound will be deafening.

Comments (13)

Little Lord Fauntleroy wrote...

The manager is at fault for picking the players who have made the errors that have all too regularly occured on the pitch this season, but there are problems more deep rooted than that.
The structure of the club is all wrong. The way it's run is all wrong. We need a new board with a fresh approach and some cash to invest in the team. As we stand, we're a very fragile squad with very little quality and are destined to finish in the bottom half of the table.
We've got 19 games in the next 11 weeks, so that will undoubtedly take its toll. I fear that a decent cup run, whether it be FA or UEFA, might plunge us into a relegation scrap that we may not be abe to get out of.

Posted by: Little Lord Fauntleroy  | October 17, 2006 8:54 AM

Little Lord Fauntleroy wrote...

P.S. I have always considered the transfer window as an unfair restriction of trade. Now I feel vindicated because in the past, a team could realise they had wasted the summer (like Newcastle) and appease the fans by bringing in a new signing or 2 around about now. Alas, those days are gone.... And Sky Sports News has to fill it's days with stories of cricketers doing charity work!!

Posted by: Little Lord Fauntleroy  | October 17, 2006 9:00 AM

True Mag wrote...

I'm afraid Lord Font is right, times are looking increasingly desperate for Newcastle fans.

I can't blame those who stayed away on Sunday. The football we have been served up ever since SBR was stupidly sacked just four games into the season has been woeful.

Our loyalty has been tested to the limit and I see you Luke cannot resist a comment about the need to stick together in times of crisis. You're right, the problem is we've been asked to do that too many times recently. It's taken for granted that we will.

I blame both the manager and the chairman for what happened in the transfer market in the summer. I don't think Roeder is a bad manager, but he messed up in the summer and he is paying the price for his lack of pulling power in the transfer market. Woodgate, Campbell could all have been Newcastle players. We all know how the chairman tends to react when results go badly. Scapegoats are needed and they are always found in the dugout.

My alarm bell is already ringing very loudly.

As for Martins, the Jury is still very much out on him

Posted by: True Mag  | October 17, 2006 10:01 AM

James J wrote...

It can't always be the manager's fault. The problems run deeper than that. The buck must stop at the top and that means the chairman's office.

I'm looking forward to Freddie's "We Geordies stick together" speech sometime over the next few days, he always rolls it out, just before he sacks the manager and blames them for everything.

I'm very bitter about the whole mess our football club is in. Roeder has made a mess of things, but the club was already in a mess long before he became manager.

Posted by: James J  | October 17, 2006 11:31 AM

Shepherd OUT wrote...

It is not too early to "press the panic button" as you put it. The fans have seen this problem coming for years. Shepherd's faliure to remove sir bobby a year before he did was compounded by his decision to employ a replacement who was himself one game away from the sack. Add to this his decision to stick by him long after the writing was on the wall and then replace him with a man who whilst "knowing what this club is all about" has previously managed and religated 3 other teams, what do you expect from the fans?

Fine he may have provided each of them with money, but look at what they bought! How could he justify employing them and then not back them with the cash. I don't blame Roeder for taking a well paid job, even if it is beyond him. I blame one man, and his removal is the only thing that will improve the club. Shepherd OUT!

Posted by: Shepherd OUT  | October 17, 2006 11:33 AM

Commulus wrote...

Never mind the panic button; with Freddie in charge he would think the siren was a passing ice cream van. More to the point, wasn't Glen Roeder the man that the Chronicle and Journal Campaigned for, when Most Newcastle fans favoured Hitzfelt, O’Neil and Hiddink?

Didn’t your Newspapers lead, and seek to persuade the gullible elements within the toon support, to give the job to the ‘nice man’. Some of us said it was a mistake and he would be totally out of his depth.

I think some of your fellow Journalists should be made aware that we will not forget their role in this ongoing fiasco. I know some neighbours and work colleagues have not renewed season tickets, next year it will be me, and judging by the attendance figure on Sunday, I am not alone. The panic button was pressed a long time ago but your colleagues chose to ignore it.

Posted by: Commulus  | October 17, 2006 12:59 PM

Foster wrote...

On Sunday the Newcastle supporters around me spent most of the second half arguing about who wss to blame for Newcastle's demise. Chairman, lots, manager, some, players some.

The blame game is up and running and I agree with the sentiments of others here, it is the chairman who has to carry the can.

Why are The Journal and The Chronicle not reflecting what the supporters think? Why do they continue to toe the party line. Will your editor tell you off Luke?

Posted by: Foster  | October 17, 2006 1:27 PM

M M B wrote...

Another demonstration of how far the club has gone backwards under Freddy.
We the fans have known for ages what you at The Journal try to ignore.
It's time for you and the rest of your journalistic colleagues to stop ignoring what we think - under Shepherd the club will never reach the heights the fans and club deserve.

Posted by: M M B  | October 17, 2006 3:04 PM

mc wrote...

The Journal and the Chronicle rightly point out that we are horrifically underperforming with the current squad and back room set-up and have been for some time. However, what you fail to openly recognise is that the common denominator residing over such atrocious performances ever since the heights of Keegan and brief spells with Bobby is the chairman.

Why will you not be man enough to come out in a united force and criticise Shepherd? All the national papers have condemned and attributed our long-suffering plight on Shepherd's shoulders. It's about time you did the same.

Posted by: mc  | October 17, 2006 3:42 PM

Big Bill wrote...

Feelings are obviously running very high at the moment and rightly so. Newcastle United have lacked direction from the top for far too long. This time I think the disillusionment among supporters will come to a head.

Nobody likes to see a game disrupted by fans protesting against the management, but I fear that is going to be the only way we are going to bring about a change.

Having said that, some supporters are so fickle that a win against Fenerbahce on Thursday night will be enough to convince them that everything is hunky dory again!

Posted by: Big Bill  | October 18, 2006 9:44 AM

Duncan wrote...

Luke, I can't help but notice that you haven't responded to any of the comments on this thread. Is that because they are too close to home and your editor won't let you? The Journal and the Chronicle are a joke!

Posted by: Duncan  | October 18, 2006 3:07 PM

Luke wrote...

As dear Duncan correctly points out, I've not replied to any of the comments here yet, but now I have so shut up Dunc!

I have some very strong opinions on the mess that is Newcastle United at the moment and yes I think the chairman does have to take most of the responsibility for the problems they are in.

But, as I've already told my main critic Duncan, I have already been banned twice by Newcastle United for writing things the chairman did not like and I'm on my final warning. I try to be as honest and frank as I can, but as I've also told Duncan - if that's his real name - there are more politics at St James's Park than Westminster.

This blog is a platform for you to have your say, all I can do is prompt you to do that with my entries.

It seems there is a growing backlash against Freddie Shepherd judging by message boards, phone ins etc etc , but there are also no significant demonstrations against him at the ground so he will write off the criticism as that of a vocal minority.

Please continue to have your say, but also please understand that my hands, to a certain extent, are tied.

Posted by: Luke  | October 18, 2006 3:34 PM

Duncan wrote...

Luke,

First off. Yes it is my real name and fair play for responding.

Secondly, if you read my post back I said "Is that because they are too close to home and your editor won't let you?". How exactly was that a critisism of you? I know you've said in the past that you are not allowed to write certain articles, which is why the comment was directed at the editors at both the Chronicle and the Journal. NOT YOU!

I accept that you are not the one who decideds what goes in to the paper but the fact that the editors are so scared of upsetting the chairman that they put you on a "last warning" proves my point.

Posted by: Duncan  | October 18, 2006 4:41 PM

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)