Grab my RSS feed | (What's this?)

About this Blog

Luke Edwards is Chief Sports Writer of The Journal and uses his blog to give a unique and entertaining insight into events at Newcastle United and Sunderland.

As well as football, Luke also regularly takes a wry look at the biggest sports stories from across the North-East and beyond. From cricket to rugby and basketball to boxing, some are criticised and some are praised.

Sometimes provocative, sometimes laugh-aloud funny, but always interesting Luke Who's Talking also gives you the chance to interact with Luke and have your say on all the major sporting issues.

Recent comments

Recent Posts

Sponsored links

Archives

Links

Sponsored links


Sack The Board

Posted by Luke on November 5, 2006 12:32 PM | 

When young children in the Netherlands are growing up they are told the story of the little boy who puts his finger in a hole in the dam to stop the valley flooding.

For Newcastle United that little - or not so little as it happens - Dutch boy was their 18-year-old goalkeeper Tim Krul.

Krul's heroics on his debut against Palermo in the Uefa Cup gave Glenn Roeder's side an unexpected and memorable victory against the joint leaders of Serie A.

The problem is, just like the boy with his finger in the dam, Krul's expoilts could only offer a temporary respite.

Just as the boy with his finger in the dam realised he could not plug all the gaps that were appearing and stop the valley below from flooding, neither can a backs-to-the-wall European victory fill in the gaping cracks in Newcastle's squad.

Saturday's home defeat to a spirited, but limited Sheffield United, has sent a tidal wave of anger and frustration crashing over Shepherd's defences.

Before my operation and enforced sick leave I wrote in the Journal that Newcastle had three games to surpress the growing revolt at St James's Park.

Home games against Portsmouth, Charlton and Sheffield United were all winnable and if Newcastle matched expections chairman Freddie Shepherd and his manager Glenn Roeder might have been able to ride out the unrest.

Two weeks later and Newcastle have managed to win just one - the Carling Cup game against Portsmouth - and have failed to beat two of the teams keeping them out of the bottom three. In that respect, the Magpies' slide into the relegation zone is fully deserved.

Given the size of the demonstration after the 1-0 defeat to Sheffield United the powers that be at St James's Park cannot dismiss the discontent as the actions of a vocal minority. They must sit up and take notice because they are slap bang in the middle of a major crisis.

But what happens now. Will Shepherd sack Roeder just five months after claiming he had given the fans the man they wanted as a manager to save his own skin? Roeder was Shepherd's fifth managerial apppintment, will the fans give him the opportunity to make a sixth?

Will a cup victory over Watford this week, coupled with the Palermo victory, keep Roeder in a job until he can strengthen his squad in January?

Will the club limp on lamely waiting for a takeover bid to come?

Whatever happens, I've got two words which will send shivers down the spine of everyone of a black and white persuasion. Leeds United.

Finally, Roeder has proven my point about Albert Luque. The Spaniard, who is a striker in a squad hopelessly short on options up fronts, scores the vital goal in Sicily and impresses with his overall attitude. His reward? Dropped.

I'm afraid that is a poor man management decision which, given the futile attempts of Giuseppe Rossi and Damien Duff on Saturday night, has come at a high cost.

TrackBack

TrackBack<$MTEntryTrackbackLink$>>

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference <$MTEntryTitle$>:

">

» <$MTPingTitle$> from <$MTPingBlogName$>
<$MTPingExcerpt$> [Read More]

Tracked on <$MTPingDate$>

Comments (18)

Commulus wrote...

Again I have nothing but praise, and agree whole heartedly with this account Luke, I just wish the journal had the guts to print it.
The main point, I repeatedly try to make is, that it was not Newcastle fans chanting for Roeder to be given the job, it was the Thompson house clique who abused their influence, to put him in place, you just have to look at the ‘true faith’ polls to see who the Newcastle fans wanted. I never heard ‘Roeder, Roeder give him the job’, it must have emanated from the press box. It doesn’t even flow as a chant. What I did hear was, ‘Glen-en Ro-eder, Glen-en Ro-eder, and my interpretation, it was a ‘thank you’ for rescuing us from the Souness horror show. The mis-interpretation offered an easy way out for Shepherd and because this was supported by a minority of fans and Thompson house, he got away with it, and for that we must ‘thank’ those responsible. I talk to a lot of fans, at work, and with family, and neighbours and I have come across only a few who supported the appointment, saying ‘he was a nice guy who deserved a chance’, the majority of the more knowledgeable fans remained sceptical, and whilst we have not ‘yet’ been proved right, at least we did not embarrass ourselves in our support for the idiocy of this regime.

Again the conservatism of the fans has been tested, (it has taken the best part of 3 years to get to them angry enough) and at last we have turned the corner, this is only the start of what is going to be a long and sorry drawn out demise of this club, it will get a lot worse.

Posted by: Commulus  | November 5, 2006 10:08 PM

Little Lord Fauntleroy wrote...

There will be no change in our fortunes until we have a change of management. Of the team and of the whole club.
Why does Freddie still hang on? Just go now.
As for Roeder, you're spot on about Luque, Lukey and it says a lot that our best player on the day (Milner) was played out of position in 2nd half and then replaced. Roeder hasn't a clue! Why didn't Duff get taken off? I've seen nothing of him to impress me. His attitude stinks and his performances leave a lot to be desired.
Roeder should play the team that wants to win, not his most experienced side. It's been proven that it doesn't work. Shepherd and Roeder out!

Posted by: Little Lord Fauntleroy  | November 6, 2006 9:50 AM

Richard wrote...

I've not left a comment for a while but how refreshing to see a local reporter willing to actually comment properly on what is going on at St James's Park.

Sack the board and, as much as I like the man, Roeder as well. His managerial record is poor and the players don't look like they are playing for him. A poor apppintment and another Shepherd blunder.

Posted by: Richard  | November 6, 2006 12:35 PM

Fred Flintstone wrote...

I've got one thing to say Sack The Board.

Actually, I've got more to say. This is not, as Shepherd's pals in the local press would like to tell us, a knee jerk reaction. This is in response top ten years of mismanagement.

Shepherd does not put his own money into the club. He buys more shares so he and his family can take even more out.

Everything at the club is in decline, finances, performance and reputation.

It's time to go Freddie and take your useless manager with you.

Posted by: Fred Flintstone  | November 6, 2006 12:49 PM

Tim wrote...

I see Shepherd has returned and will read the riot act to the players.

Big brave words from a man who will not walk away. Do everyone a favour and, for once, do the honourable thing. You are to blame for more than a decade of mis-management in the boardroom.

Is it the players' fault that you and Glenn Roeder failed to sign the right players in the summer?

I'm so angry I'm struggling for words, does the man not realise how despised he is?

Posted by: Tim  | November 6, 2006 1:09 PM

Craig wrote...

FF is not entirely to blame, apart from the obvious fact that he appointed Roeder. Whether we like it or not a team of diddy men doesn't cut it in premier league, look at some of arsenal's results and they have more quality than we have.
Teams know exactly how to frustrate NUFC and with the limited resources we have available we dont get anywhere. No coincidence that our decent results have come against teams who tried to play football. West Ham and Palermo. This is a bigger issue for the premier league in the long run than it is just for NUFC.
Proper footballing teams are being bullied out of the game. Bolton, Everton, Sheff Utd, Boro, Wigan etc etc are all winning by the same fundamentals, defend for your life and kick and kick. I am lost for what NUFC can do apart from join them in that style and I for one would resent that.

Posted by: Craig  | November 6, 2006 3:16 PM

Mick wrote...

Shepherd hasn't got a clue, the man is so arrogant he thinks everybody is wrong and he is right.

The man who told us that we were one of the top 8 clubs in world football gave us a manager who has failed almost as many times as Shepherd. He said that he would listen to the fans when appointing the next manager. We told him we wanted Hitzfeld only to have him put hundreds of hours of work by fans down as a betting scam. He then appoints a puppet who has failed at every club he's managed. Shepherd told us that Roeder knew the club, fantastic, it didn't do him any good at West Ham, the club he supported as a kid.

Shepherd Out

Posted by: Mick  | November 6, 2006 7:13 PM

Duncan wrote...

Oh where to begin?

I was proud to be outside on Saturday, but was dismayed at the number of apologists shouting “don’t blame shepherd, he’s spent a fortune on players�. Where do people with this level inteligence breed? And more importantly, who lets them? He provides money to bad managers for bad players. How is that a good thing?

Anyway, recent comments from our illustrious leader have prompted me to respond.

1. His claim that no one else is prepared to do his job…… Well aside from the 50, 000 people that immediately spring to mind, I’ll take a realistic approach. FS does not own the club; he is not even the majority share holder. He is an appointed Chairman. He CAN be replaced, but clearly no other member of the board is strong enough or brave enough to take him on. Therefore the rest of the board should be replaced for not having the bottle to make the big decisions!

2. FS says he has full confidence in Roeder's ability……..Is he missing the point or what? MR SHEPHERD, the fans have not lost faith in GR, we never had it. The fans have lost faith in you and your ability to pick a decent manager. Back Glenn all you like, but do it as you pack your bags and go. Which leads me nicely to another point……

3. Glenn Roeder was “the people choice�. Luke I’ll direct this one right at you. After the sacking of he who will not be named, the icnewcastle website ran a poll asking who we “THE PEOPLE� would like as manager. It was won by a landslide by Mr Hitzfeld. Somewhere in your IT department, the webpages and therefore result (and numbers of votes) should be archived off. Could you dig those figures out and put them on here for all to see? Maybe then he will stop lying to the fans and the press to save his own kneck.

The revisionist trollop coming out of the fat man must be stopped. SHEPHERD OUT!

p.s. You're articles on here are improving mate, we’ll make a propper hack out of you yet!

Posted by: Duncan  | November 7, 2006 1:45 PM

Little Lord Fauntleroy wrote...

Just listening to Freddie's comments made in the last 24 hours has made me realise that he isn't going anywhere. And why should he? He's making fortunes out of the club and ploughing it into his over inflated bank balance.
"I'm from Byker and had to fight my way into and out of school... I'm a Geordie... The protests don't bother me....," and probably his best one "I want what's best for this club."
I can't be mithered to waste any more energy on that debacle until he realises that even my 9 year old niece could run the club better than him. As the Italians say 'Del dado bastardo grasso ora'

Posted by: Little Lord Fauntleroy  | November 7, 2006 2:25 PM

Duncan wrote...

Can you please explain which parts of my post from yesterday stopped it being published?

Note From Luke

Because I've only just been on the site to put it up!

Posted by: Duncan  | November 8, 2006 10:41 AM

Duncan wrote...

Cheers Luke, I thought they'd gagged you again! I was all set to get onto your editor about it!

Posted by: Duncan  | November 8, 2006 3:13 PM

Commulus wrote...

Note to Duncan, Luke was referring to my Posting which had been cut/edited, for safety sake. I'm afraid a Lot of my comments are a tad over the top, as I tend to overstep the bounds of decency and legality when the word Shepherd is mentioned. Commulus

Posted by: Commulus  | November 8, 2006 3:29 PM

Paul wrote...

Luke, you're the only local reporter who tells it how it is and for that you deserve a pat on the back. Keep up the good work.

Very interesting blog, I'm a sports fan and reading NUFC only material, especially in wor current state, gets boring so its good to read a bit of this and that about the region's different sporting issues.

Posted by: Paul  | November 8, 2006 7:13 PM

Phil Douglas wrote...

Luke, A compact and succint article which I feel sums up the situation we find ourselves in. I do not know what the answer is to our problem, sacking Glenn Roeder would only leave Mr. Shepherd with another scapegoat to behead in six months time. My personal feeling is that Mr Shepherd should remove himself from the management structure of our beloved club before it is too late.

Mr Shepherd, I hold no personal animosity towards yourself, but please realise what you are doing, and if you are Black and White through and through as you suggest you are, please go before the spectre of relegation and massive financial loss for the club and therefore yourself occurs.

Posted by: Phil Douglas  | November 9, 2006 3:44 PM

D Vayder wrote...

Luke I am your Father !

Posted by: D Vayder  | November 9, 2006 7:27 PM

Duncan wrote...

Note to Commulus. I wasn't refering to the editing of your piece, I was refering to a completely different conversation Luke and I had some time ago regarding what he could and couldn't post.

Posted by: Duncan  | November 13, 2006 9:26 AM

ironflatOB wrote...

bonVote

Posted by: ironflatOB  | December 1, 2006 12:52 AM

Roumbrobcoicy wrote...

How to acquire Cheap Viagra Online

Invest in Cheap Viagra online just makes sense. It's rapid, opportune, and completely anonymous. The Viagradelivered to your habitation or labour in a nondescript package. No discourteous trips to the doctor or pharmacist.

Step One: Do Research

In advance purchasing Brand Viagra (sildenafil citrate) online, you necessitate to make sure that Viagra's right for you. Drop in on Pfizer's accredited Super Viagrasite and read for particular information on the cure, including perchance dangerous drug intercourse. If you are fascinating any physic or have any health problems, you should negotiate with your family doctor or pharmacist before invest inGeneric Viagraonline.

Step Two: Optate a principled Online Pharmacy

Palpably, you need to pick a mature online pharmacy to buyyour brand viagra online. They offer an honest reliable service, US licensed physicians and pharmacists for your Generic Viagramodus operandi, and sell only 100% absolute Viagra.

Posted by: Roumbrobcoicy  | August 30, 2008 6:00 AM

Post a comment