Grab my RSS feed | (What's this?)

About this Blog

Luke Edwards is Chief Sports Writer of The Journal and uses his blog to give a unique and entertaining insight into events at Newcastle United and Sunderland.

As well as football, Luke also regularly takes a wry look at the biggest sports stories from across the North-East and beyond. From cricket to rugby and basketball to boxing, some are criticised and some are praised.

Sometimes provocative, sometimes laugh-aloud funny, but always interesting Luke Who's Talking also gives you the chance to interact with Luke and have your say on all the major sporting issues.

Recent comments

Recent Posts

Sponsored links

Archives

Links

Sponsored links


There Was Money But It Wasn't Spent Properly

Posted by Luke on November 1, 2006 12:02 PM | 

Glenn Roeder has claimed he is surprised his Newcastle United side have not managed to transfer their cup form into the league. Well I'm not and I'm sorry Glenn, but it doesn't take a genius to work out why either.

The Magpies are unbeaten in eight games in the Intertoto, Uefa and League Cups this term - winning six, drawing two and conceding only two goals in the process.

Great, well done, but with the exception of Turkey's Fenerbahce, the opposition has, roughly speaking, been about as good as Crewe Alexandra.

Sorry if there are any Crewe fans out there, somehow I doubt you'll be reading this anyway, but Norway's Lillestrom, Latvia's FK Ventspils and Estonia's FC Levadia are hardly daunting opponents are they? Newcastle teams should be beating limited teams like that just as they should always beat lower league opposition in the FA Cup.

Last week's victory over Portsmouth was decent enough, but the bottom line is that, when Roeder's side have come up against anyone half decent this season they have struggled and, even whey they have come up against poor sides, like Charlton Athletic, they have struggled.

Roeder, like any manager, is desperate to tell us that his team's performances have not got the results that they deserve, but didn't he also used to say that when West Ham crashed out of the Premiership under his watch? Newcastle may like to think they are too good to go down - I would agree with them - but points mean prizes, not performances!

There is still a large amount of sympathy for Roeder because, to a certain extent, his hands have been tied in the transfer market. However, when money is tight was it really this most prudent thing to spend £10m on Obafemi Martins?

There have also been suggestions that the reason no more players were signed in the summer was because of money, but Sol Campbell was available on a free transfer and Jonathan Woodgate would only have cost £500,000 for a season's loan.

Furthermore, if there was no money, why were there bids made for Robert Huth, Zat Knight and Lucas Neill in the final days of the transfer window? There was money, albeit limited, but it wasn't used properly which is why the squad is so stretched at the moment and it is why it's struggling so badly in the league. Roeder and chairman Freddie Shepherd must take their share of the blame for that.

Which brings me nicely on to Albert Luque. Roeder said last month that he had not given up on the Spanish international and that he was close to finally realising his potential.

What has happened since? Luque hasn't made a single appearance, even though the Magpies are clearly struggling to score goals and are greeting the return of Antoine Sibierski from injury as something akin to the return of the Messiah. Ok, so I've clearly gone a little overboard there, but hopefully you get my point.

I'd like to see Luque given a chance because there is a decent player waiting to come out with the right encouragement. You don't play for Spain and you're not wanted by Barcelona in your career if you're rubbish. I know he has a difficult attitude, but one of the challenges of management, according to Sir Bobby Robson, is getting difficult players to perform for you.

Cheerio! In case you're interested, my recovery is going pretty well, but slowly. The sofa has become my office and Notts County are hopefully about to embark on a Premiership-winning campaign in Football Manager!

TrackBack

TrackBack<$MTEntryTrackbackLink$>>

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference <$MTEntryTitle$>:

">

» <$MTPingTitle$> from <$MTPingBlogName$>
<$MTPingExcerpt$> [Read More]

Tracked on <$MTPingDate$>

Comments (4)

True Mag wrote...

What did you make of the Sven Goran Eriksson link earlier this week?

I wouldn't mind if he was manager, he'd be a lot better than Roeder. Nice guy I'm sure, but his record as a manager is awful and his tactics have been far from inspiring.

He also paid, when we are told money was at a premimum in the summer, £10m for Obafemi Martins and then stupidly insisted that he was always his first choice signing! Doesn't look clever now, especially when he kept insisting he would not gamble in the transfer market like former managers.

Give Luque a chance on Thursday night.

Posted by: True Mag  | November 1, 2006 12:10 PM

Commulus wrote...

I agree with your post Luke, you saved me the bother of writing it, are you me by any chance? As for Championship manager, I usually cheat by taking over another good side and selling the players I want to Newcastle or replaying games until I win. ps look at Luque's stats he's brilliant and why Notts County?

Note from Luke

Just wanted a big club in League Two as had already done everything worth doing with Leyton Orient.

Posted by: Commulus  | November 1, 2006 4:04 PM

John wrote...

For goodness sake its Crewe Alexandra, not Crewe Alexander. Your paper made the same mistake last week. Sort it out.

Note from Luke

Sorry John, a typing error. As for my paper, tut tut, like Newcastle United, not good enough

However, it is not "its Crewe Alexandra," it is it's Crewe Alexandra!

Posted by: John  | November 2, 2006 9:35 AM

Commulus wrote...

No Luke I think you’re wrong. It is, 'it is, it's Crewe Alexandra!' rather than 'it is it's Crewe Alexandra!' but I stand to be corrected.

Note from Luke

I was talking about the it's not the , beforehand.

Anyway this is dull, moving on...

Posted by: Commulus  | November 3, 2006 12:34 AM

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)