Grab my RSS feed | (What's this?)

About this Blog

Luke Edwards is Chief Sports Writer of The Journal and uses his blog to give a unique and entertaining insight into events at Newcastle United and Sunderland.

As well as football, Luke also regularly takes a wry look at the biggest sports stories from across the North-East and beyond. From cricket to rugby and basketball to boxing, some are criticised and some are praised.

Sometimes provocative, sometimes laugh-aloud funny, but always interesting Luke Who's Talking also gives you the chance to interact with Luke and have your say on all the major sporting issues.

Recent comments

Recent Posts

Sponsored links

Archives

Links

Sponsored links


England's Michael Owen - The Truth Behind The Rumours

Posted by Luke on October 10, 2007 12:50 PM | 

Surprise, surprise, some people are trying to suggest there is a rift between Michael Owen and Newcastle United manager Sam Allardyce over the striker’s involvement in England’s Euro 2008 qualifiers against Estonia and Russia.

Blimey, next thing you know they’ll be telling us the Australians are a little upset about losing in the Rugby World Cup to England last weekend.

No, seriously, this sort of thing gets on my nerves, it’s just stirring the brown smelly stuff for the sake of, well, stirring the brown smelly stuff and it is Newcastle United who ultimately suffer.

Every club manager has to protect his interests, hence why Allardyce - who is privately sick and tired of having to spend 90% of his Newcastle press conferences talking about Owen - has urged caution. Rafael Benitez did exactly the same with Steven Gerrard last month and, guess what, there were exactly the same stories of rows, bickerings and eye scratching doing the rounds.

Allardyce questioned whether Owen could play two games in less than a week, something he is perfectly entitled to do given the player’s injury record. Last week, he also insisted Newcastle would decide whether he played against Everton or not, not England - again, something he is perfectly entitled to do.

On both occasions, however, he also insisted the German surgeon Dr Ulrike Muschaweck had given the striker the all-clear and that he was merely taking a cautious approach to ensure the player’s long term health. In fact, it was Allardyce - before the defeat at Man City - who raised the possibility that Owen could play against Everton in the first place.

Allardyce freely admitted at the weekend that ‘Little Michael’ had disagreed with his decision to leave him on the subs bench against the Toffeemen, just as he has admitted Joey Barton isn’t happy about being told to play reserve games, rather than sit on the bench in the Premier League.

Yet, funnily enough, there is no talk of a rift between him and Barton. Then again, that isn’t exciting and controversial is it. A disagreement between Owen and him is - star striker and manager row, that grabs attention.

As for Owen, he has concurred with his manager and publicly stated his desire to play from the start against Everton. He then said he would take the advice of Dr Muschaweck and if she said he was fit, which she has, he is fit. If England coach Steve McClaren was willing to play him from the start against Estonia on Saturday, he was ready and willing. And why shouldn’t he be?

He wanted to play against Everton from the start and he wants to play against Estonia from the start. He wanted to start for his club and he wants to start for his country, yet the latter desire is used to question his commitment to the former.

The problem with the whole Owen commitment thing is that, as far as the rest of the country is concerned, he is an England player first and a Newcastle player second. Partly because he has played so few games for the Magpies and partly because, as far as they are concerned, Newcastle are not newsworthy. Well they are, but not newsworthy in a Champions League or London sense.

And then, of course, there is that lingering bitterness from the fact Newcastle signed him in the first place, the little northern upstarts!

As Allardyce said today: “It’s just people trying to get between myself and Michael. The same thing has happened with Steven Gerrard and Rafa Benitez at Liverpool earlier this year - it’s a common theme during the international breaks.�

Owen is the only Newcastle story of genuine national interest, but only from an England point of view. Therefore he is always written about from an England perspective which, in turn, causes people to question his commitment to his club because he is constantly discussed in a national team context, whether he is scoring goals for the Magpies or missing games because of injury.

Owen is very passionate about playing for his country as lots of players are, but he does care about Newcastle, he does want to do well for his club and he does want to repay the club for the time and money invested in him. It’s not his fault other people constantly talk about him as an England player - hence the nickname England’s Michael Owen.

Owen is an extremely valuable asset to Newcastle. I’ve already said he will be United’s top scorer this season and his record of ten goals in 17 starts gives an indication of what he will bring to Allardyce if he stays fit.

But, the thing with Owen is - and this isn’t his fault - he will never belong to Newcastle as far as the rest of the country are concerned.

Hence why, once these international games are over, the rest of the season will be spent speculating about his destination when the transfer window re-opens in January and again in the summer. What was that about scratched records?

TrackBack

TrackBack<$MTEntryTrackbackLink$>>

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference <$MTEntryTitle$>:

">

» <$MTPingTitle$> from <$MTPingBlogName$>
<$MTPingExcerpt$> [Read More]

Tracked on <$MTPingDate$>

Comments (15)

True Mag wrote...

Finally someone who can give a careful, intelligent reflection on the Michael Owen saga. Those people who booed Owen when he came on (although this may have been a protest at the fact the manager was taking Martins off rather than putting Owen on)are stupid and short-sighted. We need a fit Owen and we need him to stay.
Michael Owen is selfish as all goalscorer are selfish, but he also happens to be one of the best in the business and if we keep him at SJP we'll be a far stronger team because of it.

Posted by: True Mag  | October 10, 2007 2:26 PM

Ronnie ( Busker ) Lambert wrote...

Spot on Luke, the London hacks are a cesspool of inbreds who'd sell their mothers to Egyptian brothels for paper sales. (Note to legal team, this is a flippant remark, which is no reflection on national journalists as a whole. they wouldn't really do this, honest, we're just cracking a joke, like they do on Have I got News For You!) No wonder people aren't buying papers as they used to, opting to read real news on the net., or the Chronicle and Journal.

Note From Luke
You can read me on the net or in The Journal, doesn't bother me! I had to add a little legal disclaimer to your comments, you can't really go around calling journalists inbreds etc etc.

Posted by: Ronnie ( Busker ) Lambert  | October 10, 2007 2:45 PM

Tim B wrote...

Only a tiny comment to pass on this one, but I don't think I'm alone as a Newcastle fan in saying that I would like to be just a little bit more convinced by Michael Owen's slightly weak protestations that he is TRULY a Toon player and that he really does intend to stay. I was in fantasy-land disbelief when we signed him, and he's probably my favourite player after Shearer, but I never quite get the feeling that he's going to be with us for all that long, and he never seems keen to tell us unequivocally that he will. Does this echo what anyone else thinks?!


Note From Luke
For what it's worth, if a team in the Champions League had come in for him in the summer, I reckon he'd have gone, but how many players wouldn't?
That's the key point for me. Newcastle were at such a low ebb at the end of last season, I wouldn't have blamed anyone for wanting to leave.
However, when Owen plays for Newcastle he wants to do well for Newcastle and he wants the team to do well. And the good thing from Newcastle's point of view is that none of the Big Four want him. If they did, they'd have bid in the summer

Posted by: Tim B  | October 10, 2007 4:34 PM

Tim B wrote...

Yeah...you're right Luke. Given the state of things at the end of last season I wouldn't have blamed him either. And it's true that he always does seem to give everything when he plays, so maybe I should just be glad we've got him at all...

Note From Luke
For the time being at least..... You just know there will always be speculation surrounding him

Posted by: Tim B  | October 10, 2007 4:46 PM

Beardo wrote...

A very balanced piece. You should try and sell that to a national as there are points in that should be aired to a wider audience.

That being said, it annoys me that there is so much anipathy to Owen from Magpie fans. Booing him the other day was amazing. The tabloids may think we are northern upstarts who don't deserve Owen. If we treat him like that, they are right. Furthermore, if we treat him like that again I expect him to tell us as much and get on his bike. If it happens again, I wouldn't blame him and we would have proven that we are not a big enough club for his ilk.

Posted by: Beardo  | October 10, 2007 5:34 PM

Dan wrote...

im more worried about losin Martins, cos he could become frustrated with everybody always talking about Owen

Posted by: Dan  | October 10, 2007 6:20 PM

Toonrooster wrote...

I agree with everthing that's been said in the posts and your original piece Luke which is a grest summary of the issues. What's bothering me more is not whether Owen should play for England but rather how many games he will play for the Toon this season. I predict 25 at the most, and there's no way I can see that at £100+k/week that he's good value. Trouble is no one else will even if he averages a 50% goals ratio so I guess he will stay with us,playing as many games as he is fit for, until either his long term fitness improves or his contract runs down. One things for sure, MO hasn't been the crowd pleaser we all expected for £17M!

Posted by: Toonrooster  | October 10, 2007 9:30 PM

Ronnie Lambert wrote...

Excuse me Luke, I said London journos which is miles away from Chronicle/Journal which to me after travelling to these places and having to ingest their sycophantic drivel to their audience, which really is a north/south divide away in culture, is tantamount to Red China's propogandist holiday reviews. I absolutely trust our local journos on their footie reports. That's why I deviated from my tube journey from Westminster to Tottenham every day in '86 to stop at Kings Cross for my treasured Journal for an honest report of everything Toon. The Chron and Journal are intrinsic to my personal identity, have been since I could vote, in 1968. Anyone who knows about journalism, knows that they have a bond like brickies, but regional differences and biases are part of the game. That's why recent attempts to cause divisions in our recent Toon resurgance, if you dare call it such, are a threat to the patch of southerners' stranglehold on team success i.e. Chelski and Arsenal who physically choke on the prospect of Newcastle United being successful. I've been at games in the south where the chants have been similar to fascist hatred towards the Geordies doing well, and this spurred on by the southern press's instigation. Okay, they may say that it's only footie banter, but it's also very politically hurtful to a nation separated by genuine disadvantage. Sorry Luke for getting serious, I know you weren't but it had to be said. The southern press are very nasty towards us up here and don't deserve your support on football issues if you are genuinely ' embedded ' to your assignment, as they say for war correspondents. You are 'ere lad, and you owe us your loyalty, as may have been said to young soldiers at Rourkes Drift.

Posted by: Ronnie Lambert  | October 11, 2007 1:48 AM

iain wrote...

luke if it wasnt for the fact that if owen plays in both englands next two games he will have played more games for england than nufc since signing for us. that hardly perpetuates the idea that nufc comes first does it.

how many times has owen recovered from an injury in time to play for england despite not playing back to back games for nufc. i bet its nearly every time hes had an injury since signing for nufc.

just a theory but why do you think sam thought owen got injured playing for england last time yet owen said he was injured before ? could it be that owen covered it up to play for england happy in the knowledge he could then miss some nufc games and be fit for englands' next round of games ? because funnily that is exactly what has happened.

Note From Luke
The England camp knew about Owen's problem before the last round of England games and so did Newcastle. When he came off against Derby Sam actually said he'd had it for a while. I think Sam meant he aggravated it on England duty, Owen says he didn't.
Owen has played more for England than Newcastle,m but that's circumstantial evidence. He has suffered two serious injuries in that time, one picked up while playing for Newcastle and one while playing for England.
He has not offered value for money as I've said in the past and he does want to play for England, who doesn't. I don't know any other times when he could have rushed himself back to play for Newcastle with the injuries he had, although I agree, it is a bit suspicious that he played two games for England, never complained once about his injury and then came back and "felt" it against Derby.

Posted by: iain  | October 11, 2007 12:47 PM

IamSpartacus wrote...

Note to Luke, I would have blamed Owen had he left in the summer, a dozen or so games for Newcastle in his first two years, for approx £10 million banked, mainly due to him getting crocked playing for England, he owes NUFC and its fans a massive debt, in not in terms of £££'s then certainly a debt of honour, do You think he's even familiar with the concept of honour ?. I have to say Michael Owen sickens me.

Note From Luke
I wholeheartedly agree he has a loyalty debt to Newcastle and have said as much in the past. I urged him to make his intentions known in the summer and I will slaughter him (verbally) if he leaves, but he hasn't left yet has he so hating the guy for picking up injuries that weren't his fault seems silly and self-harming. Newcastle NEED Michael Owen this season if they are going to have any chance of getting into Europe, while will enable them to offer him continental competition to stay next season as well.
Michael Owen is focused on England, who isn't when they're at that level, but I don;t buy into this "he doesn't care about playing for Newcastle thing"

Posted by: IamSpartacus  | October 11, 2007 12:48 PM

iain wrote...

luke why would he care about nufc this is the liverpool through and through lad that forced a move to madrid becuase liverpool couldnt match his ambitions, cue liverpool winning the cl and owen being a suber sub for madrid.

if his dream club wasnt good enough for him, why would we be any different.

Note From Luke
I sense you don't like Little Mo very much! As I've already said, Owen and Newcastle might be a marriage of convenience, but Newcastle don't have anyone better to put the ball in the back of the net and Owen doesn't have anywhere else to go. Surely we should all just hope it is a marriage that has a happy ending, rather than worry about why is happened in the first place.

Posted by: iain  | October 11, 2007 1:15 PM

iain wrote...

id just rather people stop pretending it was any other way.

owen is an nufc player that nobody else in the league will touch or even when we signed him there was hardly a battle for his signature, benitez never even wanted him back at liverpool just the board/gerrard/carragher did.

would it be too much too ask for once we came first and not england, even if sam had left him out vs everton he would still be off playing for england.


luke your right we dont have anyone better, and him getting injured for england again wont improve our chances of a - him doing it for us or b- finding a club who will take him off our hands freeing space for said goalscorer.

Posted by: iain  | October 11, 2007 1:39 PM

Rich wrote...

Does it really matter if Michael loves the club or not? The bottom line is we have probably the best finisher in Europe playing for our team, and that should be something to cherish, regardless of the circumstances. Everyone knows that Michael hasn't played enough games, but that is not his fault as his injuries have not been little niggles but serious career threatening ones. MO's goal record when he does play is exceptional, and should be applauded. Whether he does love the Toon or not, he scores goals for us when he plays and that it what matters, not whether he has Black and White curtains hanging in his house as symbols of his undying love for NUFC....

Note From Luke
A good point and if Owen stays fit for the rest of the season, Newcastle will qualify for Europe, simple as. I just don't get, as I keep saying, the anti-Owen feeling. You might not like him as such, but what on earth is going to be achieved by booing him? This has become a rather nasty trait of Newcastle fans - booing their own players.

Posted by: Rich  | October 12, 2007 10:11 AM

Anonymous wrote...

It's just that time of year where there is nearly as many int'l games as there are league games. After these 2 int'l games we have one more qualifier in November. Only then we will see if MO has put all his latest injury problmes behind as after the Croatia game the league games come quick and fast. Also, somebody please correct me if I am wrong, but didn't LFC fans constantly question MO's commitment when he was at LFC?

Note From Luke
I believe you're right whatever your name is?!

Posted by: Anonymous  | October 15, 2007 9:42 AM

Anonymous wrote...

Toonrooster - I could,nt agree more. And I really miss The Pink mate. Comment on "you owe us your loyalty' applies to MOwen, however to compare to the young soldiers at Rorkes Drift (not Rourkes)the most VC`s ever won for bravery by a British Army is over the top. Some of us have family in Afgan etc, etc. so when these peacocks pull on the shirt, remember our boys on the front-line.

Posted by: Anonymous  | October 22, 2007 3:09 PM

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)