Grab my RSS feed | (What's this?)

About this Blog

Luke Edwards is Chief Sports Writer of The Journal and uses his blog to give a unique and entertaining insight into events at Newcastle United and Sunderland.

As well as football, Luke also regularly takes a wry look at the biggest sports stories from across the North-East and beyond. From cricket to rugby and basketball to boxing, some are criticised and some are praised.

Sometimes provocative, sometimes laugh-aloud funny, but always interesting Luke Who's Talking also gives you the chance to interact with Luke and have your say on all the major sporting issues.

Recent comments

Recent Posts

Sponsored links

Archives

Links

Sponsored links


Do You Really Care About Tennis?

Posted by Luke on July 8, 2008 12:27 PM | 

Thank goodness for that, Wimbledon has finished for another year, we can finally stop pretending to care about tennis and we can stop banging on about why Britain fails to produce enough world class players.

Let’s face it, tennis isn’t really a popular sport in this country, it’s isn’t played in state schools, it isn’t generally played in inner-cities and, apart from the month of June, it rarely gets widespread media attention.

Sure, it has a sizeable following, but the only time the masses get involved is in June when Wimbledon forces its way on to prime time television like an unwanted squatter on a farmer’s field.

But every year we get them same old subjects cluttering up the airwaves and filling page after page, day after day, in our newspapers. Come on, be honest, now that he has moved on with the rest of the Tour, do you really care about Rafael Nadal’s ground stroke power or the size of his biceps?

Will you be desperate to find out whether Novak Djokovic can recover from his early exit from the All England Championship or whether Ana Ivanovic’s looks really do her match her ability?

And then there is Andy Murray, Britain’s great and only realistic hope for the future who, like Tim Henman before him, will be one of the best ten players in the world for his entire career, but still be labelled a failure because he never manages to win Wimbledon, or any of the other grand slams.

I rather like Murray, he looks as though he has got a little bit of the devil in him. He shouts, swears and screams on a tennis court and it must be so difficult for the snotty nosed tennis fans in the expensive seats to cheer for a rowdy Scot doing a Braveheart impression every time he picks up a tennis racquet!

I even watched his magnificent five-set victory over the Frenchman Richard Gasquet, before watching the British challenge ruthlessly extinguished by Nadal in the quarter-finals.

It would be nice to say Murray is the coming man who will eventually depose Nadal as the best player in the world, but the two are roughly the same age and you suspect the Spaniard’s muscular frame will always leave plucky (all defeated Brits are plucky) Murray in his shadow, even after the previously dominant Roger Federer has retired.

And in the mean time the search for another world class Brit will quietly continue, while we turn our attention back to football, cricket and rugby. Loads of youngsters will be built up as the next big thing and then fail year after year, only ever appearing in the first round of Wimbledon as a wild card entry before heading home on the back of a straight sets defeat to the Belarus number two!

Honestly, the inquest into the demise of British tennis has been going on for decades and still, despite millions of pounds invested, national academies and elite coaches we haven’t found a solution. Ultimately, though, for all of the time, money and effort that has been wasted, when tennis is only important for a few weeks a year, it really isn’t that surprising is it?

TrackBack

TrackBack<$MTEntryTrackbackLink$>>

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference <$MTEntryTitle$>:

">

» <$MTPingTitle$> from <$MTPingBlogName$>
<$MTPingExcerpt$> [Read More]

Tracked on <$MTPingDate$>

Comments (13)

jac mills wrote...

Luke

I am with you 100% on tennis. I never played when I lived in Sunderland (no balls?), lacking opportunity and interest. There was not a patch of grass even the size of a postage stamp where I lived. And only "pansies" played tennis, according to our local wise men. Sad to say, my wife watches Wimbledon every year, so I am out of the house a lot then. (Pity there aren't any good pubs around here!) My excuse for "allowing" her is that she is Chinese -- and doesn't recognise the word No yet. Obviously she is a slow learner. I tried the game, but never felt the passion one gets playing tiddly winks, so gave up and concentrated on perfecting my tiddle. Much more satisfying. I pity you, as a sport writer, having to give tennis your time. Hopefully it is fleeting. But who knows? One day another Gussie Moran may come along. In the meantime, balls to you, Luke. Your serve.

Posted by: jac mills  | July 8, 2008 1:01 PM

Sy wrote...

Do I care about tennis? In a word...No.

I used to watch Wimbledon every year when I was younger, but in recent years couldn't muster enough interest. As for any other tennis event other than Wimbledon, I've never been interested.

This year though I did watch a bit...maybe because I've been working sat in front of the telly, and definitely because there hasn't been a coinciding test match on the other channel.

Admittedly, I'm always more likely to leave it on if the likes of Sharapova or Ivanovic are playing, but in hindsight I'm glad I made the effort to watch this year, as the men's final on Sunday must go down as a classic. I'm no tennis fanatic, but I've never seen tennis like Federer and Nadal played. It really was worth seeing.

So in conclusion:

- No I don't care;
- No I won't be watching or reading anything about tennis until maybe next year's Wimbledon;
- But I'm glad I watched a bit this year...(I hadn't seen Ivanovic before either...another bonus!).

Note From Luke
That's another problem with tennis, the women's game, where looks are more important than ability. She is mighty fine mind!

Posted by: Sy  | July 8, 2008 3:20 PM

Paul Patterson wrote...

Come On Timmy!!!!

I always laughed whenever all the old and fat women over 40 used to get out their Union Jacks and shout for their beloved Timmy every year,- he was pigging useless and I’ll tell you why.

Love 15- Tim Henmans parents are both well to do so has never been forced to be competitive, unlike the majority of working class sportsmen who have to be to survive.

Love 30- His (Rather attractive) wife has a great T.V job, so money has never been an issue.

Love 40- He also has had sponsorship shoved up his backside for his entire career, so therefore has never HAD to win anything.

Game- Lets be fair, if it wasn’t for the crowd that rallied (Get it- Rallied??) around him every year, he would hardly win a set.

I’m sure even she must have looked down at hubby getting beat and thought ‘Hold on, I’ll come and take over Tim if you don’t mind’

On the subject of Andy Murray,- he has come in for a bit of stick because he shouts and twists his face after every shot, which isn’t the gentlemanly way of the Brits.
Well that’s why Tim Henman NEVER won anything significant, he wasn’t a character, he had no game really, look at the winners, the entertainers, they all have a style an arrogance, a proverbial ‘F**k you I’m good and you know I am’ that’s what makes them champions and winners.

John Macenroe is my favourite tennis player of all time, simply because he was a brat and proud of it, which isn’t a crime, he was entitled to be one, he never smacked anyone, he was just simply an American brat and that made people hate him. Could you imagine Tim Henman missing out on a point through a dodgy line call and then bellowing ‘Oh Come on. . . . You can NOT be serious. . . . Chalk flew up. . . . How many are you gonna miss?’ and then retiring to the chair to smash his racquet into a bunch of Lucozade Sport bottles?

He’d sulk into his chair and maybe ask the judge to think about looking more closely next time, if it’s not too much trouble sir. Poor, pathetic, loser.

As a complete contradiction, I also like Roger Federer, he is just a robotic winner, not much personality, just style and effortless class, it remains to be seen if he has the desire to keep going. Especially when defeat takes it’s toll.

Football was better when the working class had to work for their wedge- now it's given to them before they have even won a trophy.

Game, Set and Match!!!

Paul.

Note From Luke
I knew Tim Henman's wife, Lucy, very well. Lovely girl, worked with her on a television show a few years ago and we used to have lunch together!

Posted by: Paul Patterson  | July 8, 2008 3:37 PM

Paul Venn wrote...

Two words for why I used to watch women's tennis. Gabriella Sabatini! It's never been the same since.

Posted by: Paul Venn  | July 9, 2008 7:22 AM

Dave B wrote...

Luke - Just because we're rubbish at Tennis doesn't devalue it as a sport. Flag waving is not the crucial factor to the enjoyment of sport it's just part of it. If you do need the national interest then I hear those Scottish ladies that do the floor sweeping on ice with that great big pebble stand a decent chance at the next winter Olympics.

If you didn't enjoy watching Spain, Holland, and Russia in the euros or the men's Wimbledon final this year then I struggle to comprehend why you follow sport at all - come on man it was fantastic and not a national interest in sight!

For what it's worth - and you may have guessed - I do enjoy a spot of tennis, although the nearest I've come to a tennis club is the stick used by the parky to get us off the court before he locked up. Maybe if dodging broken bottles were somehow part of the tennis rules & regulations we'd have British champion after all?

Note From Luke
I don't have a problem with a sport just because we aren't any good at - although I must admit it helps if we are - I just can't stand this "why haven't we got a world champion" thing that happens once a year around Wimbledon. I'm not tennis' biggest fan, but I did watch a fair bit of the Nadal vs Federer final.

Posted by: Dave B  | July 9, 2008 9:11 AM

Stephen Rouse wrote...

Unfortunately for your entire argument Paul, Johnny Mac came from thoroughly middle class stock, was brought up in an up-market part of Queen's, never wanted for anything in his early tennis career and was supported by Daddy everywhere he went

Posted by: Stephen Rouse  | July 9, 2008 10:20 AM

Dale wrote...

Hi Luke, I actually enjoy playing tennis but am not a fan of watching it on TV. I have played tennis since my school days, as our state school was fortunate to have an astro turf pitch. So for 3 months of the year out went our four 5-a-side pitches and one 11-a-side pitch which ran right through the 5-a-side (oh the melee) pitches and in came 9 tennis courts.

The problem with tennis is a posh persons sport to be honest. I have a daughter who is nearly seven and she enjoys tennis but needs to be playing with kids her own age and ability rather than with her Dad. So I emailed 4 tennis clubs in our area asking if they had kids clubs and also were there any places in the adults clubs? Not one of them bothered to reply to the email which is not very nice. Now my daughter keeps asking when she can go to tennis club and I can't answer. Which is a shame. So she has to put up with me trying to teach her until I can find her a club.

Posted by: Dale  | July 9, 2008 10:20 AM

Stephen Rouse wrote...

Unfortunately for your entire argument Paul, Johnny Mac came from thoroughly middle class stock, was brought up in an up-market area of Queens, never wanted for everything and was supported by Daddy everywhere he went.

Posted by: Stephen Rouse  | July 9, 2008 10:27 AM

zulu wrote...

Dear Luke,

loved the tennis, best match in a decade me thinks. Quick question though, as Wimbledon 2010 will fall smack in the middle of the football world cup soccer to the rest of the world) - what will happend to the tennis fan base in the UK?

Posted by: zulu  | July 9, 2008 10:43 AM

SgtCampbell wrote...

Sorry fella, I don't know how anyone can say that tennis is boring after that final

Posted by: SgtCampbell  | July 9, 2008 11:34 AM

Nenad wrote...

Well, a few years ago, when Serbia didn't have players doing well, it was only the hard-core enthusiasts who were watching tennis.

But now, with Novak Ä?oković, Janko Tipsarević, Nenad Zimonjić, Jelena Janković and Ana Ivanović and a few more players, the nation has gone nuts. People spent nights watching tennis when Ä?oković won Australian Open, kids skip school to watch tennis matches...

So, it's a matter of results mostly...

I think people there openly knock Andy Murray, and secretly wish he wins something. That kind of attitude is disastrous for the development of any young player, especially with nation's hopes focused on him...

Why not try and support the lad and just enjoy the lovely game that tennis certainly is. :)

Pozdrav!

Posted by: Nenad  | July 9, 2008 9:33 PM

Nick wrote...

Luke just been reading your Digard article and let’s be honest there’s only one reason a player turns down another club in this day and age and that’s for money.

Even if the lad has come out and said he thinks Boro are a great club for youngsters so what? He isn’t likely to come out and say that money is better is he? He is dubbed the next Makelele which in my book is a worry when anybody is dubbed the next anything in football.

I have never seen Digard play before so I shouldn’t really pass judgement but the story puts another negative twist onto Newcastle United.

Another story which I am slightly suspicious off is the Laarson one. I thought Laarson was a right midfielder, surely with our supposedly tiny budget we won’t bring in two right midfielders.

Is it me or do these transfer windows seem to be an absolute waste of time for Newcastle?

Note From Luke
They are not having the best of times at the minute it has to be said. I think it is a measure of how Newcastle's stock has fallen that they are competing with Boro for the same players, but that is the reality of the situation. I suspect money had a major part to play in young Digard's decision though, it normally does with every footballer. As for Larsson, he can also play centrally and would be a direct replacement for Barton, which is probably why Newcastle have enquired about him but not bid yet. He'a a good player as well. I was impressed with him last season in a poor Birmingham side.

Posted by: Nick  | July 10, 2008 9:08 AM

Nick wrote...

When Laarson played at SJP last season he was by far the best player on the pitch. It will be an interesting one but I feel Barton still has so much more to give, he showed moments of pure quality last season.

As for Newcastle United 'stock' it really is depressing me, yes over the years under the wrong managers we spent and wasted a lot of money but now we have a quality manager in place. We have seen so many good transfer opportunities slip by already.

Obviously we are still only in July but this regime just doesn’t seem right to me. I try not to be reading the papers about Wise etc... But even so the manager at any club should choose the players to sign and sell the club to them.

If you run a football club its simple, you want to be successful, to be successful in any league you need to spend money and in the premier leagues case it is a lot of money.

Please I hope I am wrong but the least Keegan needs to be able to do is identify and sign the players.

Teams like Villa, Spurs and now even Portsmouth must have wide smile about the state of NUFC at the moment.

Posted by: Nick  | July 10, 2008 3:42 PM

Post a comment